Comments on: 127 Film: Medium or Rare? http://silverbased.org/medium127/ Projects and ponderings for film photographers Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:29:25 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Vox http://silverbased.org/medium127/comment-page-1/#comment-67 Vox Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:38:26 +0000 http://silverbased.org/medium127/#comment-67 A common mistake, but still, eek! A US editor could claim they were a little fuzzy on the metric system; but when a Canadian one gets it wrong, that's truly cringe-making. A common mistake, but still, eek! A US editor could claim they were a little fuzzy on the metric system; but when a Canadian one gets it wrong, that’s truly cringe-making.

]]> By: MelC http://silverbased.org/medium127/comment-page-1/#comment-66 MelC Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:55:19 +0000 http://silverbased.org/medium127/#comment-66 On the topic of film sizing, nomenclature etc., the current issue of PhotoLife, a Canadian magazine, has an article discussing the increasing popularity of 'Toy' cameras. In at least two occasions it identifies 120, as (cringe), 120mm (gagh!!!). I have yet to come up with a polite email that questions if the author actually used his camera and looked at the film etc. etc. I thought of sending them in your direction too! On the topic of film sizing, nomenclature etc., the current issue of PhotoLife, a Canadian magazine, has an article discussing the increasing popularity of ‘Toy’ cameras. In at least two occasions it identifies 120, as (cringe), 120mm (gagh!!!).

I have yet to come up with a polite email that questions if the author actually used his camera and looked at the film etc. etc. I thought of sending them in your direction too!

]]>