Silverbased

Projects and ponderings for film photographers

Archive for the ‘Vintage Camera’


The Idiosyncratic Konica IIIA

Many Japanese camera companies originally got their start by imitating German camera designs. (Nikon and Canon began by copying Contax and Leica, respectively.)

Yet in the second half of the 1950s, Japanese camera-makers began flexing their technical muscles as innovators in their own right. And within 10 years, original Japanese camera designs would completely dominate the marketplace—as they continue to do today. So I’m always intrigued by cameras dating from that first burst of technical innovation—like this Konica IIIA, introduced in 1958.

Konica III A

Konica IIIA, an innovative and stoutly-built 35mm rangefinder

“Konica” comes from Konishiroku Camera (just as Leica meant Leitz Camera). Konishiroku is the oldest name in Japanese photography, starting as an importer, then building their own first cameras in 1882.

The IIIA was the penultimate evolution of Konica’s I, II, III series of post-WWII, fixed-lens rangefinders. (While these were all meterless models, the final Konica IIIM was basically a IIIA with an ugly light meter grafted onto it.)

With the III series, Konica aimed to sell a high-quality rangefinder camera with an excellent 6-element lens at about 1/4 of typical Leica prices, by omitting the feature of an interchangeable lens mount.

Think Different

Note the absence of the typical thumb-wind film advance lever. The III series cocks its shutter and winds the film using two strokes of the lever sticking out to the right of the lens.

This odd-sounding design actually works quite nicely for me: As a left-eyed shooter, I’m able to keep my eye to the viewfinder when advancing—rather than jabbing myself in the forehead with a wind lever.

Street Shooter

Rangefinder cameras are often the first choice for photographers who want to unobtrusively capture street scenes, or people in action. M-series Leicas, whose cloth shutters only make a discreet “shlurp” sound, are the iconic example.

Yet leaf-shutter cameras can be even quieter, and this Konica is exceptionally silent. Even held right against my head, with typical outdoor backround noise I can barely hear the click of its shutter. You do give up some of that stealth with the IIIA’s rather noisy and conspicuous film-advance lever, though.

A Clear View

I need to gush about the viewfinder of this camera, the breakthrough feature of the “A” model. It is simply one of the great rangefinder/viewfinders of all time. It has a life-size 1:1 view, with very clear bright-line framelines. In fact, they’re actually brighter and larger than the ones on my 2005 Voigtlander Bessa R—which is really saying something.

Linhof Technika

What’s more, the framelines are not just parallax-adjusted; they also change size, matching a lens’s slightly reduced angle of view as you focus closer! This yields outstanding framing accuracy—not commonly a strength of rangefinder cameras.

I’m not aware of any other 35mm rangefinder which does this, past or present. Your only alternative would be to buy an immense 1960s Linhof Technika 6×7, which has the same feature (as did some older Polaroid models).

It’s true that the IIIA’s rangefinder spot does not have sharply-defined edges, so you can’t use the “split image” method of focusing. But the rangefinder baseline of about 49mm with 1:1 magnification gives excellent focusing accuracy.

Konica even innovated with the film-loading scheme for these cameras. Typical 35mm cassettes have a light trap formed by velvet strips; but Konica sold proprietary cassettes featuring a special gate, which linkages in the film compartment would open wide—thus avoiding all possibility of film scratching. Conventional film cassettes worked fine, actually, so the system is forgotten today (although I would love to find a few of the special cassettes to load bulk film into).

Evil EV

But the fatal flaw of the IIIA’s design from my point of view is its EV coupling—an interlock between the shutter speed and aperture rings.

The black ring with its white EV numbers moves in parallel with the shutter-speed ring. It engages the silver aperture scale with stiff spring tension (pulling it backwards uncouples them); but the f/stop ring does not have its own finger-grips to allow you to set the aperture directly.

Instead, you determine the correct EV number for the scene (e.g. from a light meter offering an EV scale); then wrestle with the black ring until the red pointer aligns with the proper value. After that, apertures are linked automatically to changes of shutter speed, setting the combination shown by the black diamond pointer.

Konica IIIA Exposure Scales

The Konica IIIA’s annoying EV interlock, here at EV 11. (Apologies that my EV scale looks so dirty.)

The theoretical advantage is that when you shoot a series of pictures in the same light, you can switch between the (uneven) shutter speed steps (i.e. 10, 25, 50, 100, 250) and the correct aperture is automatically selected for you—even if that is not a whole f/stop number.

Disappointingly, the 1/500th shutter speed does NOT couple correctly. Switching to that speed, the shutter-speed dial rotates further than normal, to tension a supplementary spring in the leaf shutter. Consequently the EV interlock opens the lens aperture by one extra stop, leading to overexposure.

As I rarely shoot more than a couple of frames in the same lighting, the EV coupling is simply an inconvenience. It’s hard to avoid a lot of awkward pulling back and twisting on the black ring to reach your desired settings.

Going Backwards

Konica III EV-Aperture Scales

1957 Konica III, showing aperture tab and EV scale

The IIIA had been preceded by this 2nd version of the Konica III, which had a much more sensible EV coupling system. A small tab operating the aperture could be rotated along with the EV scale (located directly on the nicely-machined shutter-speed ring). Or, the tab could be flexed outwards, easily disengaging from the EV-scale detents to set the aperture directly.

However the location of the f/stop scale—out of sight on the underside of the III’s lens barrel—was not exactly convenient.

Konica III front

Thanks to E. & K. Norris for the loan of this beautiful Konica III

There were also some appearance changes between the III and the IIIA—but to my entirely subjective tastes, the styling of the earlier model is nicer. The IIIA added an oddly-sculpted self-timer lever, and lost the III’s charming chevron-shaped advance plunger. And the IIIA’s astoundingly sophisticated bright-line viewing system came at the cost of much larger, more awkward-looking viewfinder windows.

The solidity and finish of these Konica III cameras remains impressive. Later Konica rangefinders were worthy models, but the build quality moved more towards the “consumer” end of the scale.

Konica still had one technological breakthrough up its sleeve, with 1965’s revolutionary Auto-Reflex—the camera which introduced auto-exposure to mainstream 35mm SLRs. But in later years, the company lost direction and eventually merged with Minolta; the combined company recently abandoned camera-making entirely.

So it’s nice to remember the long heritage of Konica with a model like the IIIA, which—flawed EV scheme aside—shows the company at its heights of making interesting, innovative cameras.

[a shorter version of this originally posted on Flickr 14 Dec 2007]

Albert Einstein Invented Auto-exposure!

Well—possibly.

Reading a recent Einstein biography, I was most amused to learn this little tidbit: In 1936, Einstein and an associate named Gustav Bucky were issued US Patent No. 2,058,562 for a “Light Intensity Self-Adjusting Camera.”

Albert Einstein, Overexposed in 1934

Albert Einstein, overexposed in 1934

The text of Einstein & Bucky’s patent can be seen here, and the accompanying diagram here.

This date is quite early for such radical technology: The earliest auto-exposure camera I know about which actually reached the marketplace was Bell & Howell’s Electric Eye 127, circa 1959. But I’m not sure Einstein’s design was really the first invention of an auto-exposure camera (and I don’t have the patience to research all the patent literature).

If you’re having a little trouble deciphering the patent documents, the basic idea is this: the upper lens aims light from the scene onto a photoelectric cell. This is wired to a meter movement, which deflects through larger angles as the light level increases.

But instead of the usual read-out pointer, the axis of the meter connects to a pie-wedge shape of clear sheet; this has a graduated neutral-density filter along its bottom arc. The arc swings across the light path of the lower, picture-taking lens. Brighter light levels move the denser end of the filter into the light path, keeping the exposure consistent.

You may remember that Einstein himself started out as a Swiss patent examiner. And, I don’t want to be too hard on the father of General Relativity, a Nobel Prize winner, and a certified genius. But there are a couple of problems with this scheme.

Using a neutral-density filter means throwing light away. This would not have been good news in 1936. Kodak’s then-new Kodachrome had a speed of about 8 (expressed in modern ISO terms—the scale did not exist then). So adding a filter would necessitate longer exposures and wider lens apertures—sacrificing depth of field, and increasing aberrations.

Perhaps recognizing the problem, the patent includes a second system of manual aperture stops. These are coupled so that smaller lens apertures also admit less light to the meter cell. However this seems like an afterthought—it brings back complicated manual intervention to a system that was supposed to be automatic.

Another consideration for today’s photo-geeks is whether the gradient filter would do strange things to bokeh—e.g., causing out-of-focus highlights to have an odd “fade-out” across them.

The obvious question to ask is why Einstein and Bucky didn’t make the next logical leap: Directly controlling an iris using the movement of the light meter. This was Bell & Howell’s approach, albeit with a very simplified aperture formed by two crossing, comet-shaped openings. Even then, inertia of the moving parts slowed its response time.

Ultimately the breakthrough for mechanical auto-exposure cameras was the “trapped needle” system, used in countless 1960s and 1970s Japanese 35mm models.

A light meter needle (which could provide an exposure preview in the viewfinder) is pinched and immobilized as the the shutter button button is pressed. The photographer’s finger pressure also closes down the lens aperture from its widest opening; but the needle position limits its travel, halting it at the correct f/stop.

Aside from requiring a long stroke of the shutter release plunger, the system was simple and reliable. But to the best of my knowledge, no Nobel Prizes were ever awarded.

———

Postscript: A bit more research reveals that the very first auto-exposure still camera ever marketed was Kodak’s “Super Six-20″ from 1938. It’s seen at the bottom of this column by the sadly-just-deceased Burt Keppler. Evidently Kodak sold fewer than 800—so I don’t feel too guilty for being unaware of it. Interestingly Kodak seems to have used a version of the trapped needle design I described above, as discussed in the “Notes” section of this George Eastman House catalog entry.

120: The Survivor

I was looking over some creaky old folding cameras recently—probably about 90 years old—and was amused by a curious fact: A couple of them used a film size you can still buy today.

Now, perforated 35mm film has existed ever since it emerged from Thomas Edison’s lab as a movie stock in 1892. (William Dickson is credited with the actual invention.) But only in the 1920s, after the Leica camera, did 35mm gain wide acceptance as a still-camera film.

Even then, bulk cine film had to be re-wound into special film cassettes that were proprietary to particular camera brands. Finally, in 1934 Eastman Kodak introduced the Retina camera, along with a new disposable metal film cassette preloaded with 35mm film. In keeping with Kodak’s other three-digit film designations, the new format was called “135.”

1937 Kodak Retina

My father’s 1937 Retina: 3rd version, three years after the introduction of 135 film

Cleverly, Kodak’s German division (the former August Nagel cameraworks) designed the cassette to be backwards-compatible with Leica and Contax cameras, as well as the new Retina line. Thanks to the popularity of the Leica and the Retina—and perhaps even more so, the affordable Argus—the 135 cassette was a success. Today, it’s the universally-known way to shoot 35mm film (ignoring oddities like 250-exposure backs for motor-drive cameras).

Yet this is not the oldest still-camera format we continue to use today. That distinction belongs to 120 film.

Kodak introduced the “No. 2 Brownie Camera” in 1901, a simple $2.00 box camera designed to shoot images 2-1/4″x 3-1/4″*. And for this camera, Kodak introduced a new film size, 120.

Three Generations of 120 Spools

The earliest spools had wooden cores (this one is from Ansco, who used the designations 4A or B2 for the size), later metal, and finally plastic. But the dimensions of these three spools are the same.

As time went on, 120 was adopted by a wide range of camera styles: From simple snapshooters to the fine Rolleiflex (introduced 1929) and Hasselblad (introduced 1948). Its use in these professional-level cameras helped keep demand for the format strong; so today it remains the most widely-available film size after 35mm.

I need to get on my soapbox for one brief rant: Please, please, please, don’t mistakenly call this size “120mm.” Even B&H’s online store has been known to get this wrong. The film is actually about 63mm wide, and the 120 is just an arbitrary number from the dim mists of Kodak history.

Originally Kodak’s three-digit size designations were supposed to have some meaning: but the rationales were rather obscure, and soon became unworkable as new sizes appeared. In any case, Kodak continued to give new film formats various three-digit monikers, like 127 for “Vest Pocket” camera rollfilm or 828 for “Bantam” size—right up through 110, the drop-in plastic cartridges introduced with the Pocket Instamatic series in 1972.

Today, the roadside of photo history is littered with the carcasses of extinct film formats. The once-common 116 and 616 sizes are gone, and so are 620 and 828. “Vest Pocket” 127 limps along with a single Croatian emulsion still available. Users of 126 Instamatics must scour the internet for the last sources of film.

Yet even at 107 years old, the 120 film format still seems to be going strong.

*Today we might call this “6×9 cm,” although that’s only approximate: the actual negative is more like 5.6 x 8.2 cm.